6.
How “in theory” can we measure outcomes in
family support?
There is a difference between measuring outcomes in family support
“in theory” and “in practice”.
It is useful to ask the question: How could we measure outcomes
in family support “in theory” if adequate resources
were given to the task and the practice paradoxes and dilemmas were
not there to complicate the task.
The answer can provide a starting point for thinking about measuring
outcomes in family support.
“In theory” we can measure outcomes in family support
by describing:
The outcomes
we are trying to achieve
The extent to which we are achieving these outcomes.
To do this we
would:
A. Agree on the specific outcomes
to be achieved. For example are outcomes improved
self esteem, improved family and friends networks, better parenting
practices?
B. Develop valid and reliable measurement
tools for these outcomes, eg, for self-esteem,
family and friends networks and parenting practices. (Valid meaning
that the measurement tool measures what it says it measures and
reliable meaning that if we made the same measurement twice we get
the same result.)
C. Use the tools to measure change
in clients over time (including collecting and
analysing the data). For example by measuring the clients situation
at the beginning of service, at the end of service and at a point
in time after the completion of service and analysing the results.
D. Showing a cause and effect connection
between the service provision and the outcomes.
This could be done in one or more of several ways, for example:
Research
design such as random assignment of clients to different types
of service provision
Connecting
research findings with practice measures. For example in measuring
health outcomes we can monitor the number of people who are smoking
or non smoking because there is separate research to show the
connections between smoking and health outcomes. If there were
adequate research into family support outcomes we could connect
our service measures with the findings of that research.
|