Gareth Morgan in Images of Organisation describes images of organisations
and their implications for practice.
Some
of the images in his book are:
Organisations
as machines
Organisations
as organisms
Organisations
as brains
Organisations
as cultures
Organisations
as political systems
Organisations
as instruments of domination
Morgan
argues that these metaphors create ways of seeing and shaping organisation
life.
Key
questions are:
What
organisational metaphors are you using?
What are their implications?
Reframing
organizations
Lee
Bolman and Terrence Deal in Reframing Organizations make the case for
four ways of making sense of organisations.
The structural frame
The human resource frame
The political frame
The symbolic frame
They
argue that managers who can understand and work across these four frames
will improve their leadership and management.
The
assumptions that underpin the four frames are:
The structural frame
Six
assumptions underpin the structural frame (p45)
Organizations exist to achieve established goals and objectives
Organisations
increase efficiency and enhance performance through specialization
and a clear division of labour
Appropriate forms of coordination and control ensure that diverse
efforts of individuals and units mesh
Organisations
work best then rationality prevails over personal preferences and
extraneous pressures
Structures must be designed to fit an organization's circumstances
(including its goals, technology, workforce, and environment).
Problems and performance gaps arise from structural deficiencies
and can be remedied through analysis and restructuring.
The human resource frame
The
four core assumptions of the human resource frame are: (p115)
Organisations exist to serve human needs rather than the reverse
People and organisations need each other. Organisations need ideas,
energy, and talent; people need careers, salaries, and opportunities.
When
the fit between individual and system is poor, one or both suffer.
Individuals are exploited or exploit the organisations - or both become
victims.
A good fit benefits both. Individuals find meaningful and satisfying
work, and organizations get the talent and energy they need to succeed.
The political frame
Five
propositions summarise the political frame (p186).
Organizations are coalitions of diverse individuals and interest
groups.
There are enduring
differences among coalition members in values,
beliefs, information, interests, and perceptions of reality.
Most important decisions involve allocating scarce
resources - who
gets what.
Scarce resources and enduring differences make conflict central to
organisational dynamics and underline power as the most important asset.
Goals and decisions emerge from bargaining,
negotiation, and jockeying
for position among competing stakeholders.
The symbolic frame
For
core assumptions for the symbolic frame are (p242-243):
What is most important is not what happens but what it means
Activity
and meaning are loosely coupled; events have multiple meanings because
people interpret experience differently.
In
the face of widespread uncertainty and ambiguity, people create symbols
to resolve confusion, increase predictability, find direction,
and anchor hope and faith.
Many
events and processes are more important for what is expressed than
what is produced. They for a cultural tapestry of secular myths,
heroes and heroines, rituals, ceremonies, and stories that help people
find purpose and passion in their personal and work lives.
Culture is the glue that holds an organization together and unities
people around shared values and beliefs.
Key questions
What is your preferred frame?
What is your organisations' preferred frame?
Can you operate across all four frames?
See:
Reframing
Organisations, Artistry, Choice and Leadership. Bolman, Lee G and Deal,
Terrence E. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 2003.
Images
of Organisation, Morgan, Gareth, 2nd Edition, Sage London, 1997